I've been bouncing all over the net lately reading about Tau: tactics, would-be titan discussion, broadsides, etc. I'm going to get some stuff off my mind (hopefully in a concise, constructive manner) and open a discussion.
I'd like to discuss this - no flaming, just an intellectual discussion... perhaps thinking outside the general 'box'.
I'll start by setting the stage with an example regarding titans... seems to be a popular Tau topic for debate. The most common argument is that Tau would not use a walker titan. I've read: Tau simply use smaller spacecraft... Tau would make a BIG drone... Tau would never use something titan-scale for surface battles. All of these arguments root themselves in the idea that Tau are so 'mobile' oriented.
The codex even lends weight to this by saying they don't establish forts or long-term bases of operation...
But then why did Forgeworld create Tau space platforms? Sure some tradecenters are needed, there are Tau citizens, and docks are needed for repairs... but couldn't this all be done ship-to-ship (going along the lines of the previously noted root for mobility arguments). The above arguments making me think 'nomadic', which the Tau are clearly not. So to reply to one of the above mentioned arguments... why wouldn't the Tau use something titan-scale? I'd think an army would use anything that can cause tons of destruction if the situation and need arose.
Wiggus, bless his little blue head, argued that Broadsides aren't stationary/"lumbering" units (a couple pages back on this site). I think most people that would argue that they ARE lumbering would cite the lack of jetpacks the other suits have. I'd agree with Wiggus, but they're hardly an example of above-average mobility. Heck, lowly grots move that fast... and the broadside takes bigger steps (think about the whirling grot feet, lol). I don't think broadsides really lend much weight in either direction as far as movement mobility is concerned.
On the other hand, I don't think Tau guns are designed with mobility in mind. How many Rapid Fire weapons do they have? What would happen if crisis suits weren't stable enough to count as stationary? The Tau have a lot of mobility in terms of movement, but I don't think their weapons technology is designed 'equally' mobile (though there is some assault weapons and the suits could be argued as wargear). Take a look at the broadside again... Its main weapons aren't mobile at all.
I'll move to the Hammerhead for a second. What are the most expensive upgrades for the vehicle? Those that add mobility to weapons (multi-tracker and gun drones). Compare this to something like the Eldar... their pricey vehicle upgrades increase survivabilty (holofield, for example)... yet decoy launchers cost the least the upgrade could charge.
I'm not really swaying either way on this debate... honestly I think GW should take a slightly more hard-lined stance on the debate, if the Tau are as mobile as some argue. On the hand, Tau forces are built with mobility - I'm thinking more in terms of being able to deliver firepower. But, obviously, Tau do have home planets and major foothold colonies so you can't through static behavior out the window and go so far as to scream nomadic behavior. So I wouldn't go so far as to say a "lumbering" (or even truly lumbering) walker titan is out of their grasp.
... okay... so that's my mind dump. If you want to discuss this, I'm open to ideas - just try to give support to what you say... makes things more interesting and constructive.