im so goner get had with this, but you people have gone so oftopic with this argument to the point were you all have to put into place so see the point that actualy being made,
I'm sorry but why have you bothered to call iron warriors their is nothing IW about it infact you will be better doing it alpha legion and get infiltrate for cheaper
I know, but I'd rather the Oblits separate, and the infiltrating siege destroying too, it'll rarely come in handy but it's fluffy and themed (which is my priority), I had planned to have more havocs but went against it as I needed a solid core.
IW are about heavy firepower, the list I have there is heavy firepower, it just isn't on tanks.
OK for a start you cant have your "Oblits" in separate squads because you've gone and got 2 squads of termies so rule wise you'd would be in the wrong, if you ever decided to do it. or are you putting one squad of termies with the lord as a retinue so why don't you mark that properly in your post.
God that just drives me nutsonce again if you want "infiltrating siege destroying" get Alpha Legion and save your self 66 points by paying for Siege specialists and the reduced cost of infiltrating you get by being in alpha legion.
as far as fluff is concerned, it seems to me that you cant think of your own so are jacking the story of the iron warriors, with the adding twist of
"they don't really, stay in fortifications cut of from the rest of the group isolated and hold off the attack, instead they go and hide in bushes around the enemy so they can jump out and then not move the rest of that game because we have heavy weapons"
as far as a themed fluff, why don't you go with, an alpha legion base which theams on the lines, of
"we be very infiltraty cos we like attacking from motiple angels with what ability, but not only that we have special Ninga style and carry C4 against bunkers, and tippy toey when in minefield"
It's also to prove a point that IW can be themed beyond lots and lots of tanks with little to no troops, which is the powergaming that gave them a bad name
No, an army full of powergamign cheese Warriors armed to the brim in tanks with two 5 man squads is lame.
so let me get this strate you try to save a reputation of an army which you yet openly admit that is "an army full of powergamign cheese Warriors armed to the brim in tanks is lame"
so now not only have you stolen a chunk of fluff because you cant make your own, and made a complet mockery of, but now you tell us you hate the fluff anyway.
Grats you have been vertu-slapped, in support of the incereassed need of cyber fightingMy previous army lost because it had no counter-attackers, this one does, the Termies,
with iron warrior you laydown high firepower support and do not depend on counter attack but only a few options of high defense units like some obblits, possessed, supped up demon lords and CSM.
you got chewed up because you made the
"lame" list that did properly compensate for this weakness. END OF STORY
do you only have fun when you're winning something? man, if so, I'd hate to see you with in a relationship. it'd be over before it started.
I'm sorry but when was their a need you to express the lack of appreciation you get for actually getting a girl,
omg has the world gone MAD that us 40k players are such geeks yet still can get girls,YAYsadhvikv is only pointing out that the reason this guy has posted a wannaB IW armylist is Because he couldn't make a real one and got all sad about it, not that constant winning is the only way.
Basilisks...they suck. Really, they do. They'll die first or second turn, and there's 125 points down the drain.
I'm so upset as well because rattling snipers get tuned up every time i send them into close combat,
lets see basilisk is a long range artillery piece that specialises in long rage support far behind friendly lines, so what the hell is it doing in the open that it gets shot first-second turn. think about what it says in the fluff, seeing as that happens to be the one thing driving people nuts here, hell join the party