With my politics tutor hat on, I'd actually argue that there's no such thing as an objective position in any case
.
I can't say that I will recall her tenure as prime minister with any great fondness, particularly in the latter years, when her European policy left the UK well and truly facing the abyss in European negotiations, and left us isolated. That's not to say that she didn't have any qualities, she certainly could lead, but the fact that she was such an uncompromising figure was extremely divisive, and her attitude towards the public sector in this country was, in my opinion, not at all constructive.
I wrote a substantial project on her for GCSE coursework many years ago. She was certainly a character, and had to be tough to compete in a very male dominated environment. I have respect for how hard she had to work to get to where she got to.
Apart from Europe, I'll remember her mostly for her relationship with Reagan, and their collective championing of neo-liberalism, and the free market. I suspect this is where the great divide will remain. If you're a massive supporter of the capitalist free market system, deregulation, and neo-liberalist economic policies, then you'll probably have been a fan. If, like me, you're more sceptical about this, then you're more likely to take a more critical view of her time in office.