Topic: harlequin assault scenario, errata to codex?

[Fenris of the North]

I'm looking at the scenario off the games workshop website, I'm sure you've all seen it, but my question is, should we consider the "new" rules for the holofields and kisses as errata to the experimental codex? it seems to be a post-cj 39 work, since it has rules for mimes in it.

my 2 cents,

Fenris of the North


Asking for copyright-protected material is against EO/40k.ca rules. This post has been edited to reflect this. Have a nice day.

[Jonik]

No the Harli assualt scenario is not an update, nor should you really use the rules given there over the codex they have printed.

The scenario was written by an american team with no contact to Gav and his semi official army list.

[Fenris of the North]

Dang and blast, but at the same time phew, at least we still get a 4+ to shooty and wound on a 2+.  I guess We'll just have to wait until gav gets off his rumpus and makes an actual codex, and I ain't pick, I don't need a full sized on, just something along the lines of the craftworld eldar codex would be juuuuuuuust fine for me.

my 2 cents,

Fenris of the North

P.S.  I'm off to write a battle report about a tyrannid v harlie match, where can I post that here?

[Dark Flame]

  You can post all batle reports on this board: http://www.eldaronline.com/community/index.php?board=38

[Rhòanin]

I believe the current count is 2 years for the CWE codex and 5 for Harlequins.

But we can always hope it'll be sooner.

[Rasmus]

No, the scanrio is quite stand-alone, and not be viewed as a substitute or errata for the CJ lists.

The only errata for the CJ 39/44 lists are in CJ 50. and the errata in cj 50 could use some errata as well.