I've been thinking a bit about the new point costs for warlocks, which seems ridiculous, warlocks and even psykers are not that powerful and in the beta rules they get hit even more.
Then I started thinking what if GW meant warlock skyrunners....that would mean a warlock only pays 20 points for a bike, not 30 and a conclave warlock only pays 15 points for their bikes (massproduction making them cheaper
With the new farseer cost, they pay 20 points for their bike or did they mean farseer skyrunners? Nah, I think they did that right, just as the spiritseers points increase seems valid.
In addition I've read that the warlock cost is so we can't spam battalions, well we already pay at least double the price or each troop entry minimum comparred to Drukhari, so that's a NO, well how about the supreme command then, well with only 0-3 of every datasheet that's a big NO as well.
Would it be overpowerred to assume GW did a big miss and as a house rule say, GW meant warlock skyrunners & warlock skyrunner conclave?
That would mean 10p cheaper jetlocks and 15p cheaper conclave jetlocks, which I haven't seen anyone using, nor read about in any forum, since those units have been sitting on the shelf.
Minimum jetlock conclave would still cost 90p and loose character status.
Minimum battalion cost would be 240p comparred to Drukharis 190p and IG is probably even more extreme.
Another thing to notice is, if using the FAQ as RAW warlocks would only pay 10p for a bike, which would be a no-brainer, but for some reason conclave warlocks needs to pay 15p.
What are your thoughts?