I really appreciate the refinement here.
It may be best to leave the 100% influence / score 1000 or whatever open and make it a function of the number of players. Let's say a score of 10 per player. So ten players: score 100, 100 players: score 1000. Regardless, a three month completion point will serve to determine a campaign winner.
Sending in a result a week after should not be a problem for the overall score of the campaign but as far as a weekly update it may be a problem. I guess a 24 hours or even a 48 hours allowance would be ok but whatever the allowance, that would be the week's posting: results posted on a Tuesday or Wednesday. My thinking is 24 hours should be sufficient, but hey, Imperial bureaucracy, warp travel problems, webway infiltration, it may add to the fun.
As far as large point battles go having greater weight, as I said, I just don't know. On the one hand, you have someone who has invested much into an army, on the other, you have the new player. What if you had an additional influence point/score point per 500 army points or even 1000 points? I think it could work. At what point do you think a battle should be weighted twice as much or in some way more? I guess I am open to this point.
In the case of two on two where every player has a primary detachment I would say the winning side gains a win for each of the factions the players play and a loss for each of the factions that lost. Say you have a 2 on 2 game where all of the four players have a primary detachment, the winning side has a win result for each faction, 2 if the same faction, 1 each if different factions. The losing side has a loss, 2 losses if the same faction, 1 each if different factions.
As to custom chapters or craftworlds, etc. perhaps an option is best. The player chooses, prior to the battle, which chapter or craftworld the result will apply to, or, the faction is separately listed in the campaign stats, or, all custom factions are combined as a single faction by race, say "Custom Space Marine Chapters" or "Custom Craftworlds". I will add that I think the first two of the three possibilities seem best to me.
As to the website, yes, the address is sfcampaign.wordpres
s.com , but I will say this, I am just getting going with it and it is nothing much, I'm not sure that it would be better than a post, and I find the 40konline interface much easier to use. With moderator permission of course, I am thinking a post would be better.