Just read an intresting article concerning the resons for the brexit. Forgive the in parts bad google translation, i tried to fix the worst blunders
"He looks so, the European enemy, not particularly educated, from the country, over 60. He also has something against the Internet. 71 percent of the people who voted for the Proposed referendum on United Kingdom membership of the European Union, see the Internet as a "force of evil" as a quick survey revealed after the vote. That the ancients have betrayed the youth, because they are no longer interested in the new, is the great mantra after this election.
It is obvious that all can not live in the English hinterland of the 17.4 million exit proponents, where besides the Internet also feminists, Green and foreigners are despised. Even in the London area, the epitome of casual, cosmopolitan life, 40 percent voted for the exit.
But that someone could have voted with a university degree and a job with perspective against the EU, just does not seem to imagine. When people voluntarily leave a club, the other club members praise as heaven on earth, such mortification can be coped best by declaring the rejection with the narrowness of the naysayers."...
"There may be somewhere in North Lincolnshire a few confused spirits who believe that the turning away from the continent promises paradise. Apparently there are also people that hold the UKIP leader Nigel Farage for a serious politician rather than a political handbag seller. But those who had not clogged eyes and ears in the past few weeks, knew that it is a risky thing to get out of the EU.
The conspicuous unwillingness to deal with the reasons for the election victoryObama has warned of the withdrawal, the IMF and virtually every economist of distinction. That a majority of Britons still decided to choose independence, increased understandably the surprise of the Forsaken. Everywhere you can now read, many Britons never realized what they voted for and that they agree that they would reverse their decision. But that is part of the therapeutic program, which the media offers in this country for the psychological relief of their readers. Also, the myth, the elderly have the stolen the young ones the future, can be refuted easily. In the 18- to 24-year-olds, according to Sky Data, the turnout was 36 percent. If anything, the youths slept through the future.
With the shock of the election in the UK corresponds a conspicuous unwillingness to deal with the reasons for the victory. That one of the oldest democracies in the world could have lost confidence in the European institutions, because they valued their democracy, is a thought that has been quickly banished again. Instead, we hear how ruthlessly David Cameron was to call a referendum. One can not organize the referendum on such a complicated thing as the EU membership, is the put forward in numerous variations argument.
It is amazing how many commentators have parroted that, without being aware of what that says about their understanding of democracy. Translated, the phrase, elections are only good as long as coming out of what is deemed the part formed fit. Or how it brought the "Star" columnist Mickey Beisenherz to the point: "Democracy is a good thing The stupid thing is only that the stupid are allowed to take part.."
"Deepening" is the code word for the further transfer of power to BrusselsThe fact that the announcement of Geert Wilders and Marine Le Pen, now also to ensure that in France and the Netherlands referendums are held, is seen as a threat, shows the fundamental weakness of the European project. What should we the people vote for, if not the key issues? About the level of roaming charges, or the sex ratio at the traffic light man?
If one where to take a real look for the Brexit reasons, one would have to be talking about the refugee policy. One will never be able to prove what part played Merkel's open borders policy for the outcome of the referendum. But the images of refugee columns toward Bavaria scared many Britons, that may be considered certain. If not even the disciplined Germans are willing or able to protect their borders, who should succeed then?
The voices were barely counted, there was already talk of Europe must deepen in response to the British referendum. "Deepening" is the code word for the further transfer of power to Brussels. The SPD chairman Sigmar Gabriel has submitted a plan for a "Community Growth Initiative", an "economic Schengen", as he calls it, which means nothing more than that the governments lose more power over their budget, that is then distributed to where the demand is seen in Brussel. It takes a very special relationship to reality, to pick out from the vote of the British the task to further weaken national parliaments.
Populists such as the EU-opponent Boris Johnson appeal to emotions. People like Gabriel are obsessed with the idea, policy can be purchase agreement by promising subsidies from above. One can argue which side has the worse man. In any case, it looks as if those that appeal to the heart rather than the wallet, right now are on top."