Well man i had that wight dwarf in my hand this afternoon and... ot look pretty nice to me yet i have some terrible though for this army.
What for? i guess because mechanicus is needed? there should be 3 codex for mechanicus including this one if my info are correct. Apparently on the long run they should replace grey knight as the codex is supposedly goign to be left to die same for the the sister of battle (don't know the english name).
Next how do they look? ... well... well... i like them a lot. Load of details very much how i would have imagined mechanicus so for me they are nice. A bad point for me tho. I know they are mere human they can't shant list eldar do but damn those walker. They are like way too close between the heavy support and the fast attack only the weapon change feel weird to me. I know eldar tank are the samd design aswell but that stil give me a weird feeling with this guy's.
Well next is the rules... ... ... ... does that make enough dot for you to understand that i feel this guy's are beslubbering over powered? That's just ridiculous. Normal guy have a sx ap rapid fire and the other rules i don't remember, ... for x points... like wait what? We should not have problem with copieright as these are in the wight dwarf do we? If there is please correct me.
And do we speak about the one with the sx apx weapon that
which does very nasty things that you'll have to read about for yourself?. .. for x pts the dude? Ridiculous.
And the
relatively heavily armoured walker walker with the x+ cover in the open. Don't even speak about fluff to me... 11 armor with an open toped walker were the pilot is so opened ghat any welk trained sniper would do a one shot one kill in this...
well i like them model wise but i fear them game wise. There you have my though.
Edited for rules and stats - please see forum rule 1 for further details. Note that copyright applies to White Dwarf too. GW can publish as many rules as it wants to, but we cannot - Iris.